Beef + Lamb New Zealand has welcomed Government action on regional freshwater rules and Significant Natural Areas of biodiversity, in the passing of the Resource Management Act Amendment Bill – moves it has been calling for for some time.
B+LNZ Chair Kate Acland thanked the Government for its pragmatic and sensible approach and noted many of the rules introduced by the previous Government were unworkable and went too far.
“This isn’t about doing nothing – it’s about farmers wanting to be supported and enabled to achieve good environmental outcomes within workable and enduring frameworks. There’s a huge amount of incredible work happening on farms across New Zealand, protecting and enhancing catchments and native biodiversity, and farmers are committed to continuing this work.
“Pausing regional councils’ work on freshwater plans and identifying Significant Natural Areas means we can work together to get the new national policy frameworks right.”
Acland pointed to B+LNZ’s recently released independent review showing some of the national bottom lines (NBLs) relating to suspended fine sediment and E. coli are fundamentally flawed and unachievable.
A review of published literature showed that around 20 percent of waterways coming out of catchments in their natural state – for example National Parks – do not currently meet the suspended fine sediment NBLs. Even if agriculture was stopped and all catchments returned to their natural state throughout the country, up to 38 percent of all rivers would not meet the suspended fine sediment NBLs.
“This provided a solid evidence base for us to say ‘we need to stop before regional freshwater plans become operative on the basis of these flawed bottom lines’.
“The Government has listened and we welcome the Bill’s amendments as a vital circuit-breaker. We now have time to get this right.”
She noted that a commonsense approach has been used and that where regional councils need to progress water plans for flood protection, natural hazards, Treaty obligations and the like, exemptions can be granted by the Minister.
The Bill also means identification processes around Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) have been pushed out for three years (to 2030) while the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity is reviewed.
“We’ve been saying for a long time that the existing criteria in the NPS-IB are far too broad and will tie up vast swathes of land. Many farms in areas such as Northland and the West Coast will have more than half their farms identified as an SNA and will be unable to make sensible decisions about the management of their land.
“We need to take time to reassess these criteria and get the overall way we manage biodiversity right.
“We are committed to this. Sheep and beef farmers manage around 24 percent of New Zealand’s native vegetation habitat. We take our role as guardians of their land very seriously and see it as a legacy to pass on to future generations. We don’t want our hard work turned into a liability.”
Acland also noted: “Recent reports from central and local government about the excellent management by farmers of intensive winter grazing practices this year – even with the removal of the rules around this – show that farmers are committed to making real environmental progress.
“We just want good enduring frameworks to work within.”
Acland said other amendments in the Bill would also provide much-needed certainty for farmers and regional councils.
Taking the flawed low-slope map out of the stock exclusion regulations was supported by B+LNZ.
She said there were other commonsense changes such as those aimed at addressing issues from a recent interpretation of the RMA from the Southland water plan which would mean that nearly all farmers in the country would need to obtain a costly consent to remain lawful but perversely would be unlikely to be granted consent.
ENDS
For media enquiries, please contact media@beeflambnz.com or call 027 235 9806.